Rilwan Balogun writes
Recently, Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, presented before the state House of Assembly, the 2021 Appropriation Bill tagged, “Budget of Rekindling Hope”.
While it is not unconventional for state governors to tag their annual budgets with different connotations, successive failures to live up to the deceitful appellations call for a radical reflection.
Over the years, we have heard Budget of Consolation when it is obvious that Nigerians are excessively robbed beyond consolation; Budget of Deep Vision, when they know our eyes are deeply blind to spot and identify their serial rape against our intelligence and perpetual mismanagement and ineptitude; Budget of Infinite Transposition, when for years we have been transposed from prosperity to destitution; Budget of Kinetic Crystallisation, when in reality we are backwardly led to uncertain position; Cabalistic Diversification, when in the long run, we realised it was merely a pun on the masses’ intelligence.
It is however conventional that we see the state governors paying lip services to the fiscal implementation, despite catchy appellations for the annual spree exercise called budget presentation.
The recently presented 2021 appropriation bill by the Lagos State Government contains a proposal that resurged popular criticisms against official profligacy, which has long been the bane of our bastardised democratic system of government.
While surreptitiously admitting that the masses are despondent in their quest for good governance, the government fed us with the “Budget of Rekindling Hope” and canvassed that, in its bid to keep the cost of governance low, it had proposed that the state was set to stop the payment of pensions for ex-governors and their deputies.
The governor is ostensibly making a premeditated move to repeal the Public Office Holder (Payment of Pension) Law which came into operation on May 9, 2007. This was 20 days barely before then Lagos governor and now political godfather, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, finished his second term tenure.
The law to provide for the payment of pensions and other fringe benefits to public office holders states that, any person who held offices as an elected governor or deputy governor (referred to in this law as a public office holder) shall be entitled to the payment of pension at the rate equivalent to the annual basic salary of the incumbent governor or deputy governor and other benefits as provided by the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission.
The law further prescribes that the payment of the pension shall be for life, which shall be charged upon the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the state. Section 6 of the law defines “public office holder” to mean the governor or deputy governor only.While the motive for this law is res ipsaloqitor” based on this ravenous enactment, it can be concluded that the law was made wittingly to enrich greedy political office holders and their political heirs at the expense of the poor masses.
I am particularly enraged when letters of law are cobbled up, drafted and manipulated for the purpose of benefiting the makers and political heir apparent. When it comes to accountability and taking responsibility for liabilities, the governors exclude themselves from being identified as chief public officers in the state, whereas, they position themselves as the only public officers that are entitled to immunity and other fringe benefits.
Then, one needs to ask whether this is the true version of democracy that is defined by government of the people, by the people and for the people?
Chapter 12 of the Criminal Code Act, under Section 98, which deals with corruption and abuse of office by public official defines persons employed in the public service to mean:
(a) any person holding any of the offices of the civil office;
(b) any officer which a person is appointed by or under the constitution;
(c) any office of arbitrator or umpire in any proceedings, a member of commission of enquiry.
In fact, virtually all those that can be regarded as civil servants or employees of the state with the EXCLUSION of the chief public servants; that is, the governor and the deputy governor.
Similar laws creating an ambience for the perpetual obligations exist in virtually all the states of the federation, where outgoing governors’ gluttony throats remain fixed with the state treasuries.
No doubt, Nigeria’s version of democracy and self-made enactments give room to official profligacy. What infuriates one is that when the law seeks to accrue benefits, the referred public officials, who are beneficiaries, shall be skewed to mean governors and deputy governors. But, when it relates to liabilities and criminal responsibilities, then public official shall be enacted to mean every other person with the exclusion of the governors and deputy governors. Nigeria’s political elite manipulate to the letters of law to suit the bourgeoisies’ interest. This to me, is the peak of abuse of public interest for personal aggrandisement.
Source: The Punch
